This week we are continuing to look at the many different mediums in the art world...Last week I began talking about painting and this week we will finish that and pick up with sculpture. Which is a nice segway to begin talking about our next exhibition opening in Kipp Gallery. The exhibition is entitled "The Far Side of Function: Contemporary Works in Wood" and showcases some of the biggest names in furniture design and wood sculpture from around the country and also in Canada. Having such a show right under our noses gives us a chance to view the work in person for extended periods of time as well as to see them in the context of the gallery and our campus.
This is an interesting show in the fact that it is specific to a certain material...wood, but the exhibition is actually comprised of a large range of types of work. On display are objects intended for very specific functions, objects that are strictly sculptural and also works that exist in a strange place between those two worlds. This is what people in the art world would call a fine craft exhibition or an exhibition from a craft based perspective.
Here are two other artists that also work from a craft based medium Grayson Perry and Dale Chihuly. Please take the time to look at both links and also the artists' works. Both these gentlemen and the nature of their work have done a lot to bridge the gap between the age old argument of "art versus craft". Read this quote from Grayson Perry directed at our artist from the last post Damian Hirst..."The trouble with pottery is that it is almost too close to art to be co-opted into it. A shark, that's OK. But a pot - that's too close for comfort. If you call your pot art, your being pretentious. If you call your shark art, your being bold and philosophical."
Please respond to what it is that Grayson Perry is saying and whether or not you agree with his statement... or respond to one of the questions below.
After viewing the exhibition in Kipp Gallery and also the pieces in the Performing Art Center, please comment on what you think of the exhibition by addressing one of these topics: do furniture based works belong in a gallery?... does this all qualify as sculpture?...what is the argument all about between art and craft?
I agree with the Grayson Perry quote. Art, like pots, etc. are known to be art, but a pot can be bold and philosophical. What Grayson is trying to say is that not everyone sees a pot as bold and I agree, but they should. I guess art is in the eye of the beholder. =)
ReplyDeleteI also do agree with Grayson Perry's quote. I think he is trying to say that just because it is something little and plain does not mean that it not full of meaning. It's how you take something and use your creativity to fully understand more of what the artist is just trying to portray. Like we learned in class... art has a function. A pot could just be an average object to someone but letting your mind expand and realizing a deeper meaning is what I feel Perry does.
ReplyDeleteGrayson Perry seems like a very interesting guy who incorporates memories of his past, such as the anger of his stepfather, in his artwork. I like that he can create art on each end of the spectrum and therefore I agree with his quote. Whether it be an explicit painting or a humble pot, they still are art and have different meanings to each viewer.
ReplyDeleteI do believe furniture based works belong in an art gallery because it is a piece of art. It expresses who they are or how they feel about something so I believe it should sit next to the paintings and sculptures. I would not classify it to be a sculpture unless the furniture was created by the artist as well. To me, a craft does not have much meaning behind it, but a piece of art does.
ReplyDeleteWell it depends on what it is used for. If a sofa is being made to be sat on, than no. If something is being made to be admired or looked upon, than yes.
ReplyDeleteI believe furniture based works belong in art galleries, just like any other piece of art. However, I disagree with Nate, they can both be used to sit on as well as just to look at. There is no reason you shouldn't be able to use something that also pleases the eye.
ReplyDeletei believe that furniture based works belong in art galleries with any other piece of art. Because it has to be thought of, designed, carved, or put together. It doesn't have to be extravagant to be art, art can be ordinary. It is in everything, people just don't recognize it as art usually because it doesn't stand out. But anything designed, thought of, or created i believe is art.
ReplyDeleteI definitely believe that furniture based works belong in art galleries. I went to the Kipp Gallery on opening night, and was taken back my many pieces that were on display. They were beautiful and and different. I agree with David Derricott when he says "...art can be ordinary. It is in everything, people just don't recognize it..."
ReplyDeleteI agree with the Perry quote that sometimes people think that pottery is "To close to art." I think that people belive this because the pottery has another purpose other than art; however i think that there are many pieces such as pottery or furniture that are masterpieces of artwork that took time and that are meant to be art.
ReplyDeleteI think fruniture works belong in galleries. The artists put just as much, if not more thought into their pieces. They have to think of the design, function, and purpose. David Derricott said, "..art can be ordinary. It is in everything, people just don't recognize it..." That quote states exactly what I believe.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the quote Greyson wrote. He is trying to say that not everyone always see the "art". Like a pot, people use it just as a pot and do not notice the actual boldness of the pot. I think it would be nice if people noticed the art in everything and not just in a painting or drawing.
ReplyDeleteAfter visiting the art gallery yesterday I defintely think furniture based works belong in art galleries. Artists put alot of thought and time into what they wanted the furniture to look like so I think their work definately deserves to be in the gallery. As far as furniture qualifying as sculpture, it depends. I think if the furniture was made to serve as a chair or a sofa than thats not a sculture. But if the furniture was just made to be observed and looked at then, I think it would be considered a sculpture in that case. So it all depends on the artist intented function of the piece.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Perry that as long as furniture is not being used as it would it our homes than pots can definately be classified as art. If one can find meaning behind the piece than it should be displayed in galleries. The more it is available for criticism the more popular the art will become.
ReplyDeleteI agree with what Perry said. Art is up to the person looking at it. Any piece of art can be bold in its own way. It's in the eye of beholder sometimes a pot is bolder than a shark
ReplyDeleteI believe that furniture based works do belong in museums and art galleries. In previous classes we talked about how art can be anything if put into an institution. Even the urinal we saw in class was considered art. If it serves a specific function and intended to do a job within our culture it can be art.
ReplyDeletei agree with his quote. i think that a lot of people think the same way..that if something isn't bold it isn't art. art is everywhere, but if it doesn't jump out our make a statement, then a lot of people don't consider it art. i think a pot is art. someone obviously put a lot of time and effort into making it meant something to him/her. but like we said in class, art is only art when specified by others.
ReplyDeleteI believe that certain kinds of pottery can be considered art. There are pots that hold flowers that are just for show. But if theres a piece of beautiful pottery sitting in an art gallery i consider it art. But the piece of furniture in the picture above i really like and believe it should be considered art because its so nice. But with what Grayson said i agree with because i really think pottery's art.
ReplyDeleteI think that Grayson Perry uses art as a main way to express his emotions. This piece of work is very interesting and has a lot of meaning.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Grayson Perry's quote. Art can be a expression no matter what the medium. Even if pottery is a regular craft, a "artistic pot" could have meaning depending on how/why it was made. If it's acceptable to turn a urinal sideways and call it art, making pottery should be fair game as well.
ReplyDeleteto answer the question does furniture based art belong in galleries,i think they do belong in there because the artist takes an exisiting object and makes it their own, its just like most paintings which are copied from scenery and made into their own
ReplyDeleteyea i think they belong because everything is art, and that piece of furniture means something to someone somewhere
ReplyDeleteI believe that furniture can be sculpture and art, but I don't think that furniture should be placed in a gallery, or a museum. Even if the furniture is pretty, and elegant like art is, to me it's still something that someone uses to sit on. That is the only reason I believe furniture shouldn't be placed in a museum.
ReplyDeleteThis piece of art is even more amazing in person! I did all I could not to try to sit on it! The creative detail was so powerful along with his other pieces of work.
ReplyDeleteDoes all this qualify as scuplture? Yes, all of the creative and artistic elements are present in the works. It's just made of different materials than we are used to seeing, i.e. stone and metal.
ReplyDeleteI agree with what Grayson is saying because some people may see ceramics such as a pot as art, while others do not. It depends on the person and what they consider to be art.
ReplyDeleteI also believe that furniture based works belong in a gallery. The craftsmanship can be very detailed and unique. And I also believe it qualifies as sculpture, because in some cases the pieces are sculpted, but also because it is a three-dimensional form of art. Lastly, I think the argument all about between art and craft is that perhaps that some may think crafting is easy and could easily be taught, but this goes along with every form of art. So a craft is art to me because it can be beautiful and unique.
I also agree with Grayson and how he says that pottery can sometimes be art. It takes time and patience to make pottery as does art. Now mass produced pottery is not as much of a art but hand-skilled pottery is because it was thought out and took time/
ReplyDeleteI believe that furniture based works belong in art galleries with the other pieces of art. The artist made the piece have a particular function by putting thought and expression into it, making it appeal to people and that is art.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Grayson. It would be very easy of someone to make something like a pot and call it art. But it takes a true artist to go beyond that and put themself out there to make a shark. And I also believe that furniture based works should be in art galleries. The pieces are not just regular pieces of furniture they were created to be something different and in some cases beautiful objects to look at and admire.
ReplyDeleteArt that is based on broader subjects and that utilizes materials not common in art is more valid in my mind because of the creativity the artist brings to the table in his or her work.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Perry. Art can mean many different things to many people, its just up to how the viewer sees the art.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with Grayson Perry's quote. I think what he is trying to say is that not everyone views a piece of art as "art". People normally just see the piece as what it really is such as a vase, or pot. However, each piece has a truly different expression of designs and a meaning associated with it.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with Garyson Perry's quote. What I got out of his quote was that art is depicted by the viewers own opinion. For some, pottery such as a pot is a definite piece of art, but for others it is just another form of what they may use on a daily basis to cook. I believe that every piece of work is art in its own sense because to the artist that piece, no matter what the public may say, has a significant meaning to them and that’s all that matters.
ReplyDeleteI visited the art show on Tuesday, which was really fascinating. I saw some really creative unique furniture based work that I found to be very interesting and I enjoyed them all very much. I think that furniture based work most definitely belongs in a gallery. This is because I believe that each unique piece serves a purpose and tells the viewer something about the artist as well as opens one’s mind to new creative forms of expression.
I agree with Grayson Perry's quote. I think what he is describing here is that saying a shark is a piece of Art it pushes the limits of what we already know as Art. Art is continously being pushed to new extents and expanded to new ideas. I believe here Perry is just stating that to help art grow with the times we must always push a little further and test the waters.
ReplyDeleteWhile most people who have commented on this post have agreed with Perry's quote, I would agree to disagree. Pottery is art. And the "shark" could be art too. It seems like Perry is the one being pretentious by feeling like he has the right to say pottery is not art.
ReplyDeletewho are we to decide what is art and what isn't these days? art can be a piece of string glued to a wall or a pen photographed just laying on the floor. anything anyone does is art in some way, shape, or form. i very much enjoyed all the pieces from the show, "The Far Side of Function: Contemporary Works in Wood". just goes to show doesn't matter what type of material you have, if you build, paint,draw, glue or sculpt it.. they will come!
ReplyDeleteI would have to say I agree with some of the other comments about Grayson. If a sofa is used in a living area or game room not so much art, but seen in an exhibit changes our perception. We as humans view art in all different ways, so really this chair means a lot.
ReplyDeleteI would agree that furniture belongs in the art gallery also. Some of the pieces i have seen are absolutely breathtaking. I would consider that art in its most beautiful form.
ReplyDeleteFurniture does not have to be furniture. We like to cast aside things that we do not see as art but, there is never a true answer to weather furniture is art or not. It is who looks at the art that decides. I think that if a bunch of plain wood is put together to form a seat then it is craft, but if there is some meaning some thought behind the piece along with some striking characteristic then it can easily be seen as art. While I find this piece to be tacky slightly it is still very striking and intriguing to the eye.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI really like this piece. It's extremeley creative and is visually pleasing. To me this is definatley art, with a function. Not only is it nice to look at, but you can sit your ass down and relax in it after a long day.
ReplyDeleteI think this pice of artwork is sweet. It is considered art and should be placed in museums and art galleries.
ReplyDeleteI DO think that furniture based artwork belongs in a gallery because it was made with persicion and made in a certain way to please the eye. When i saw this bench at the art exhibition, I thought it looked cool and just bright and colorful, therefore pleasing to my eye.
ReplyDeleteI personally do believe that furniture based works belong in a gallery simple because many things can qualify as art in the eyes of different people. Most of the time art is something that pleases the viewers eye and furniture can be very appealing to the eye. For instance people purchase furniture that is nice in their opinion for furnishing their house so why couldn't it be good enough to be placed in a gallery. The furniture inside of the Kipp Gallery was very nice and creative. The piece that caught my eye was the chair that had the flames on it (the picture that is posted above). This piece was very colorful, creative and in a way abstract to me. It wasn't a typical bland chair.
ReplyDeleteAfter seeing the furniture based art at the show, how can you not think it belongs in the gallery. I mean some of the pieces i thought were more appropriate than others and found them more interesting but they were all amazing and all belonged to be displayed in the exhibit.
ReplyDeletei feel that furniture based art can definitely have a place in a gallery. if it was crafted to be beautiful and someone made it in order to express something that they were feeling than it has every right to be called art and to be seen as its own special piece in a gallery.
ReplyDeleteI liked the couch as well as the gallery itself. It was very interesting to see the different projects, but the flaming loveseat bench was the best. I wonder if it took a month for the creator to make it?
ReplyDeleteI would disagree with Perry's opinion to a certain extent. I do believe pottery can be art. Anything around us in my opinion can be art it depends on what you think about when you are looking at it. Are you thinking how detailed the peice may be or what the artist may have had to do to create such a peice of art. I think art is all around us and we must look at the hard work put into even the simplist peice of work such as a pot.
ReplyDeletei would agree and disagree with his statement..a shark could be art. but a pot could also be art. i think it is wrong to out rule pottery as art. anything could be considered art it's all how you preceive it
ReplyDeletei beleive that any work that took time out of your life to create a piece is considered a sculpture. If you hand crafter an art piece, technically it is a sculpture.
ReplyDeleteI think that all sorts of works show up in galleries and that furniture based works do belong in galleries. They show some sort of expression from the artist and should also be considered art. I also believe that furniture based works should qualify as sculpture because just like clay or stone, the artist had to sculpt something out of the wood to create what they want.
ReplyDeleteYes I do believe furniture based works belong in galleries. However, I also feel there has to be something special about them. For example, if you make just a basic chair with nothing unique about it, it wouldn't belong. But if you painted it special or carved some cool designs onto it, then it's a different story.
ReplyDeleteart is purely based on a persons opinion(obviously). A pot can be art but at the same time can also be used to put a plant in. Which not only makes a pot useful but part of the overall picture. When you look at a pot with painted designs all over it and a say a flower in it, youre not going to just look at that pretty flower. But if you craft a shark and call it art like Grayson Perry said, then most likely it is art because it is something to look at and admire....the same can be said about pottery in more cases then you think.
ReplyDeleteI feel that some furniture based works do belong in a gallery. It just depends on what the artist think is art. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion of what art is and what it isn't. So who is one to say that furniture based works shouldn't be considered art?
ReplyDeleteI agree with Perry. When he says "If you call your shark art, your being bold and philosophical," I see what hes saying. A pot is simple, it is already considered art, but going outside of the norm makes an artist bold.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with Perry's quote, especially when he says, "If you call your shark art, your being bold and philosophical." A pot itself is already considered art, that's where the creativity comes into play and thinking outside the box that makes unbelievable art.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Perry in the sense that all art is unique and sometimes you need to go above and beyond in order to really create an outstanding piece and have a deeeper meaning into wat it stands for or represents. No matter what the piece is at hand there is always a meaning behind it but only the viewer of the art can interpret fully what it is so therefore anything in the world can be good art to someone but not to others. Something as simple as a pot can be good art as long as you the viewer have an imagination into what it can mean and how you view it.
ReplyDeleteYes, some may think that a pot is just a pot. but it is in the eye of the artist and the differences in the pot that make it artwork. Just because something is beautiful and different doesn't mean that it cant also serve a basic function. The same is true for furniture. Someone may see just a chair, but the artist took the time to look at a chair and see it differently and give a different perspective on what the chair can be, or mean to the person looking at it. Beauty, creativity, and expression of an individual can also be functional and still be considered art.
ReplyDeleteeveryday life is full of art. a pot that we would expect to be art sometimes gets looked past becasue we are more interested in the more bold and unexpected pieces of art, however the pot could have more meaning than we are letting our selves see.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Perry's quote. Something, like a pot, may not look like art to one person, but to the next it could be the greatest thing they have ever seen. Art has a function. Just because something is plain, and ordinary does not mean it does not hold artistic value, or any meaning. Like art has a function, a pot has a function as well, and is crafted. So why not consider them one in the same?
ReplyDeleteI agree with Perrys quote. Just because something is plain or simple dosent mean it dosent have meaning. All artwork is created to have a purpose, and something as simple as a pot can have a purpose. I also think that furniture or that bench for example is art. An artist created it took the time and it too has a purpose.
ReplyDeleteI like this piece of furniture and could definitely see this being in a gallery. I think furniture based works are just like any other kind of art work..if there's meaning and feeling behinf it then i dont see why not. In reguard to the quote, i agree with Perry..whether it's a pot or shark, it's all about the meaning. Something may seem so insignificant but may actually hold more meaning and emotion than something like a shark that may be considered more "bold"
ReplyDeleteI agree with Perry's quote. Just because something is plain and does not have extravigant features, does not mean that it does not hold value. As said time and time again, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Also the symbolism that a clay piece such as a pot can hold in one culture or to one person can be significantly different to someone else in another culture. Everything has meaning, and it is up to us as individuals to look beyond our everyday norms to see the deeper meaning.
ReplyDeleteI do believe furniture based works should belong in a gallery because they could be designed and shaped in so many unique ways.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Grayson Perry. Some people might not look at a pot as art, but others may. As we talked about in class, a lot of what people consider art is opinion.
ReplyDeleteI think he is saying that something has to be unique in order for it to be considered art.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Grayson Perry's quote. People give meaning to objects. A pot to one person may just be a pot, but to another person - it can have a meaning and a purpose. It is all up to the one viewing the object as to if it is art or not.
ReplyDeleteI think furniture can hold its own in a gallery. Some furniture pieces are beautiful and can be put next to any painting or sculpture and look like it belongs.
ReplyDeletei agree with wut perry was saying,who has the right to say a pot is not art, because i know damn well i cant make wut the potters make. art is wut u make it, no1 can say different
ReplyDeleteI loved the art exhibit! It was absolutely amazing. I think that the furniture in this exhibit should be considered art, because it was crafted creatively and painted. I think that wood work and other furniture is just a craft because it is made for a purpose to use and not for looking. the furniture in the art exhibit was more for decoration and not for use. that is why it should be considered art.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Perry's quote. Art is what you want it to be, and how you want it to express something. A pot might not look like art in one person's eyes, but in the eyes of another, it may be a beautiful piece of art. It all has to do with how you see it, and how you want it to be seen.
ReplyDeleteI believe there is a fine line between art, meaningless pieced together "art", and just plain lunacy. To me I don't entirely agree with Perry's statement because there are plenty of things out there that are coveted, and worshiped as art that just don't make sense like the shark, or the urinal, or garbage smathered together into a heap and called a sculpture. But once again it all goes back to the idea of "in the eye of the beholder." If you take a look at jewelry design, many people would believe some beautiful jewelry is art, but what they are actually seeing is great craftmanship. To look for a piece that is art, you have to look at designers and see if they push the envelope, desgins that are not replicated, manufactured, but one of a kind. I am excited that we are taking a look at Dale Chihuly as I very much enjoy his work, having seen it in person at the Phipps - one of my favorite pieces is there.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Grayson Perry's quote. I think that everyone views art as something different. He may think that calling a pot art is stupid, but im sure there are plenty of people out there that call pots art and agree with it. Art is in the eye of the beholder. The great thing about art is that anything goes.
ReplyDeleteIts up to the artist to call something art. whether its a pot or a shark. I do agree with Gary but art is what you make of it.
ReplyDeleteI think that furniture or anything else that an artist spends time on belongs in a gallery. Everything around us is art in its own way. It all depends on how each individual views that specific item.
ReplyDeleteI think that if furniture has some sort of fancy design on it and isn't just a regular couch it can be considered art. The chair thingy with flames and peppers for legs is art to me. I agree with Grayson Perry. A normal pot is not art. However if it is uniquely shaped is painting interestingly, a pot could be in some circumstances considered art, if that's what it was intended for.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletei think that many people view art as a way for "out there" people to let it all go and express these unique and super creative ideas. So if Hirst wants to put dead animals in tanks of fluid, it's new, creative and never been done before, so it's art. But if someone makes a pot and it's beautiful, it can't be considered art because that's been done before. i think that's what Perry's kinda getting at.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI believe that pottery as well as furniture can both be considered art. As mentioned by some of my fellow students, art is in the eye of the beholder. Just because a couch or a loveseat is used to be sat on, doesn't mean it is it's only capability. An artist could make a couch with jewels and beads and consider it art to himself. In that case it would be art because he gave it meaning. If other people said it was not art, it wouldn't matter, their opinions are irrelevant because to the artist it is. Look at a nice art musuem the chairs their are often very fine felted and placed neatly in relationship to artwork, this in turn makes it a part of the art.
ReplyDeleteI think that pottery and furniture can be considered art. someone has made it and had an idea of how to make it. Everyone has their own idea of what it can be in their minds.
ReplyDeleteArt is anything you want to make it. Like you said in class: "beauty is in the eye of the beholder". You can make art out of anything, there for that couch can be considered art
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI really liked the furniture art that was in the Kipp gallery. If you're going to have a coffee table, why not have one that is really cool looking and someone worked hard to make it. Furniture has function, just like art, so when they're together I think its even better.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed going through the Kipp gallery. I think some furniture can be considered art. But like we have discussed in class, almost anything can be considered art.
ReplyDeleteThis piece makes me think of someones birthday when I look at it.
ReplyDeleteThis piece is definately different and I am not really sure how i feel about it.
ReplyDeleteI believe that furniture is considered art. It is something that someone created, and really almost anything that someone created could be considered art.
ReplyDeleteAs I see it, craft pieces such as pottery and furniture can be titled as art. Even when pieces are chosen for functionality purposes, asthetics always seem to serve as the most important factor.
ReplyDeleteFurniture can be considered art. Anything can be considered art, and when I look at this piece, I feel that the artist put alot of time and effort into making it. Its a beautiful piece in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteThe quote from Grayson Perry is true I believe. Pottery is clearly a form of art and a shark is not usually but can be. Art to me is according to the creator and the beholder. I believe that furniture based works do belong in the gallery and can be considered sculpture. I had the woodworking studio and that is what made me realize that furniture and woodworking is a form of sculpture and a work of art.
ReplyDeleteThis piece is a little weird, it not my typical idea of art. To me this is just a chair and u sit on it. I don't know it just not that interesting to me.
ReplyDeleteFurniture is not art in my opinion, but if it is just used to look at then it could be considered art.
ReplyDeleteI think that furniture can be considered art. Some of it is just so eye appleaing that you almost don't want to sit on it for whatever reason
ReplyDeleteFurniture is definitly art when it comes to the sense of creating the different shapes of furniture. I'm a huge person on modern decorations around the house such as modern paintings and furniture. I like the "new age" style.
ReplyDeleteI believe everything is in some way artwork because of its creation process. Someone took out the time (whether the art turned out good or bad) and focused on making whatever they created. Most buildings are works of art when you sit back and look at them and all furniture is; from the "apulstry" to the detail in the armrest. This type of artwork is definitely art because its main purpose is to serve as art and possibly a bench if you choose.
ReplyDeleteI believe that in a way artists are just trying to make bold statements. Pottery can be art or can't be art in my opinion. If you take it and do something that stands out or leaves a lasting impression on a large group of people I believe it can be considered art. But crinkling a peice of paper and setting it on an obtuse angle should not be considered art. I personally just think artists are getting carried away or just trying to be 'different' an are getting away from the main focus of what art is.
ReplyDeleteThis piece of art can definitely be put under the sculpture category. That piece of furniture took just as much thought, time, creativity, and dedication to make as much as any other sculpture. I like this piece and would buy it if I had the money.
ReplyDeleteI agree with his quotes. I think it's interesting that he incorporates his past in his work. I feel as if work can always be better if there has a personal meaning behide it. I believe this type of artwork is definitely art because its main purpose is to serve as art.
ReplyDeleteArt can be found in pretty much anything so there is no limit to what can and what cannot be art. As far as limiting something and saying it doesnt belong in an art gallery, I do not believe you can say something doesnt belong. So I do feel that furniture based art work belongs in art galleries.
ReplyDelete