The following is an excerpt from Christo and Jeanne Claude's website. It is an explanation on how they view the work and was also written by them. The website is very in depth and covers their entire career. Take a few minutes to browse their site and then respond to the questions at the bottom in bold print.The temporary large-scale environmental works (both urban and rural environments) have elements of painting, sculpture, architecture and urban planning.
For instance the Surrounded Islands, Biscayne Bay, Greater Miami, Florida,1980-83. could be seen as giant flat paintings (shaped canvases).
The Pont Neuf Wrapped, Paris, 1975-85. could be seen as a very large sculpture, in a traditional sense of antique folds and draperies, however the bridge, while wrapped,remained a bridge, a piece of architecture. Cars were rolling on it, boats were passing under the wrapped arches, the public was crossing the bridge, walking on the fabric.
The Umbrellas, Japan-USA, 1984-91. has to do with urban planning. 3,100 umbrellas, each two stories high, 59.3 square meters (638.17 square feet), spread on a total span of 49 Km. (30 miles) by a width of 4 Km. ( 2.5 miles) along roads and highways, adjacent to barns, temples, churches, gas stations, schools, habitations and cattle.
Once the work of art has been read for what it really is, then the process preceding the completion is easily understood.
Nobody discusses a painting before it has been painted.But architecture and urban planning are always discussed before completion. People discuss the possibility of a new bridge, a new highway, a new airport before those are built.One of the numerous permits to be obtained from various government agencies, in addition to the 25 ranchers in California and the 459 rice field farmers in Ibaraki, was the 200 pages book from the Ministry of Construction in Tokyo. They worked for one year, together with our engineers, to finally grant us a Permit to build 1340 houses (shaped canvases creating settlements as houses without walls).Our projects are discussed and argued about, pro and con, before they are realized.To understand our work one must realize what is inherent to each projectHowever there is an important difference between our works of art and the usual architecture and urban planning, we are our own sponsors and we pay for our works of art with our own money, never accepting any grants nor sponsors.
Their monumental undertakings have always been controversial. This controversy stems not from the subject matter, but because of the encroachment into public space. After viewing some of the projects by these two, would you be opposed to a large scale Christo project happening on our campus?...In your hometown? Would you be concerned about the temporary disruption of your daily activity? Is all this spectacle really not worth it considering the very limited time that the actual piece will be around? Does the work really enhance or change for the positive the environment that it is in? Would it be better to just erect a permanent statue? Why do you think that some artists prefer that their works exist only for limited amounts of time?
I like the idea of big art in random places. It makes you recognize the beauty of your surroundings that you might otherwise not notice.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Erin, having big random pieces of art not only gives character to the surroundings but it as well shows different types of art.
ReplyDeletei went to new york a few months after the gates were taken down. if i knew about them i would have gone earlier because this kind of art is interesting to me.
ReplyDeleteI would LOVE to see something like this at our campus. Some of the art we have here now, I’ve seen a thousand times...I would like new stuff. I would not be upset that it would be taken down, just for the reason stated above. I would get tired of it eventually. Temporary is good with me, it keeps my attention longer than a permanent piece. I think art like this enhances the environment, which is something this world needs.
ReplyDeleteI do not think i would mind seeing their art aroung campus or my hometown, i think it would make it interesting and something different to look at. i also do not think they should make a permanent statue because this is the type of art that they enjoy to create and it is different from everyone elses are which makes them widely known and famous for their work of art.
ReplyDeleteI think it would be really cool to have art like that around campus. And it would not bother me that eventually it would get taken down because it keeps things fresh and interesting. Some artists might prefer this because it is more exciting and since its only going to be there for a limited amount of time more people might like to view it.
ReplyDeleteI think having them make something on campus would be cool. From what I've seen of their work, it wouldn't really disrupt anything, . Having work up for a short amount of time Their art is very colorful, so it would enhance the environment it was in for the time being, and bring people in to see it. I think some artist take down their art after a period because they have respect fo r the environment, and want to leave it how it was.
ReplyDeleteIt would be great to see and experience this kind of art at our campus or in my hometown because it adds something unusual to the environment. The fact that it would be taken down makes it more intriguing because to fully appreciate a piece you need to experience the impact of it being gone.
ReplyDeleteI think it's a great idea but I don't know how it work around here. I like the idea because it's very beautiful art that he designs. I wouldn't want it though in my hometown because I like it the way it is.
ReplyDeleteI would love to see artwork like this on our campus or in any public space. It may cause a choas of people for a short time but isn't artwork choatic. The most beautiful part about their artwork is that it is not made to be profitable, its made to represent there inner feeling of what art means to them and allowing others to understand there creativity free of charge.
ReplyDeleteQ. Christo project happening on our campus?...In your hometown?
ReplyDeleteA. I would not mind a bit. Their projects garnish a lot of press attention. Not only would it enhance the surrounding, but the temporary economical boost from tourism would be huge for each local economy.
Q. Would you be concerned about the temporary disruption of your daily activity?
A. I personally wouldn't be concerned. Yet, I'm sure some the creatures of habit out there would see it all as a huge inconvenience.
Q. Is all this spectacle really not worth it considering the very limited time that the actual piece will be around?
A. I think the "Spectacle" is a natural product of the non-permanence. The short time frame of the work causes the urgency in media and viewers.
Q. Does the work really enhance or change for the positive the environment that it is in? Would it be better to just erect a permanent statue?
A. It does enhance the environment while the installation is shown. I think a permanent statue becomes part of the norm after existing for a while.
Q. Why do you think that some artists prefer that their works exist only for limited amounts of time?
A. A lot of it has to do with the press frenzy that can ensue with the temporary nature of the works.
I would not be opposed to a large scale Christo project on campus or my hometown. I think it would be such an honor because it would be a part of history.
ReplyDeleteThe disruption may annoy me at times, but overall I would be very pleased if somehting like this was happening.
To some this type of spectacle is not really worth since it is takes longer to put up then when it is actually done and in place. But to me that is what makes it different and cool.
The work does change the environment that it is in because it is something everyone would come to see because it is so different. And it would most definitely not be better to put a permanent statue because that is typical.
I think some artists prefer that their work exist only for limited amounts of time, because it is unusual for this to happen. Also, their work would be recognized in the present and the future in stead of just the future.
I don't think I would be entirely opposed to a large scale Christo project within my hometown, simply because I think it would be something new and exciting within the area. However, I think it would become a nuisance if a project was done here on campus, because there would be too much chaos involved.
ReplyDeleteI think in some cases this type of art could be disruptive and strange in a way. the normal public world outside is full of nature thats not manmade. However, thats what could make something like a large scale Christo project so interesting: a random piece of art thrown out of place into an environment that doesn't seem right. It would be cool to see something like that around here and I agree that it should be temporary because it would only make it more interesting.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think the idea of public art is great. It make the urban setting more pleasing to look at. The fact that it is temporary only makes you appreciate it more. You get to see the contrasting landscapes with the piece and without it.
ReplyDeleteArt work, like that of Christo and Jeanne Claude, to me feels like a gimmick. Every piece is a spectacle because no one could believe something of the sort could be done. Plus with the pieces only existing for a short period of time, combined with the oddity, make for greater press and more money in selling the sketches of the work. I've heard mixed reviews from friends who actually got the chance to see The Gates exhibit. Many of my friends who reside in NYC felt it was a nuisance because it interrupted their habit of taking a walk in the park for relaxation. Yes, each piece is interesting, but to me there is no artistic value in them.
ReplyDeleteI like the artwork style that christo and jeanne claude have. Although their style is unique, I do not see our campus or my hometown to be an ideal location for their art work to be publicized. Unlike NYC where there are an immense population and tourists, Indiana is quite secluded.
ReplyDeleteI personally like the idea of temporary art work. While it does seem sad that it only lasts for a short time, it gives it an organic feel. Life comes and goes and beauty does too, this style of art work reminds me of this idea. I would most certainly not be upset if this art work was put in my area. I would feel very honored to be a part of it and be able to see it first hand. It is only temporary so even if it did intrude on my daily routine i would not mind. I find what they do to be very bold and it speaks very loudly. I love the idea of throwing off the balance of the everyday.
ReplyDeleteI really like the idea of big art pieces. I think it would be really cool to have something like this on campus. It would give students a new surrounding and make our campus stand out more. I love all the big art pieces that citys have.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Laura! Can you imagine if Iup had a bunch of umbrellas or similar form of art all around the oak grove. It would be fascinating to see art in this form because we forget how the simplest things are art and how they can be interpreted into nature.
ReplyDeleteI would enjoy something like this on campus. It would brighten up everyone's daily routine. I don't believe it would inconvience anyone, only enhance their surroundings, and possibly cheer up their days.
ReplyDeleteI would not be opposed to a large scale Christo project happening on campus or in my hometown. There would be no disruption of your daily activity it would only make it better by having something unique and beautiful to look at. I do believe it would be worth being on campus even if it's for a little amount of time. I don't think i would like a permanent statue because I like change and think it would be good to bring in something different every once in awhile. The piece of art work will enhance the environment in a positive way.
ReplyDeleteI dont think that there is a problem with having different pieces of art on a landscape. It makes you recognize the beauty and has something different for a person to look at. some artists like their work to only exist for a limited amount of days so that they have different spaces and objects to work with.
ReplyDeleteI think this type of art allows the viewer to see nature in a different sense and see the real beauty of it. Exhibts may not last that long but the effects on how people see nature after the exhibt are will always stay with them
ReplyDeleteI think the idea of temporary art is a great idea. The fact that it would only be in the oak grove for a short period of time would somehow make the work stand out more, unlike the other artwork that somewhat blends in after passing it day after day. Our campus could really use some spicing up and this kind of art work, to me, would be perfect!
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't mind having this artwork in my town or here on campus at all. i think because its temporary i wouldn't mind it being in my way for a few weeks or months. I think the beauty of it out weighs the annoyance of it. I think the way its in the enviroment and how its set up is really beautiful and in some aspects its better than just an ordinary statue. I think some artists prefer temporary art because it really shows great work but then it goes away.
ReplyDeleteI feel that this piece of art added a beauty to the environment. The best part about it is that it satisfied everyone. For the people who did not like it, it was a temporary piece that eventually got taken down, and for the people who enjoyed it, they got to see the environment in a different view. Its a piece of art that even after it is taken down, it will always be remembered.
ReplyDeleteI would like to have a temporary piece of artwork on campus or in my town. I think the mix between art and nature is very interesting and creative. I like the idea of a temporary piece because it is interesting for a little while and you'll never get sick of it.
ReplyDeleteI would also like to see more art around campus. It would certainly make the campus come "alive" and give it a bit of distinction.
ReplyDeleteAs I thought about the question I realized I myself have never really thought to deeply about my surroundings. I don't think I would mind an art project like these around campus either temporary or permanetly. Either might bring more excitment to our campus because as of now we do not have any major pieces of art around it. The pieces that are around campus are small and colorless. I think maybe a large or small piece with more color might bring some energy around campus that is much needed.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't mind having some of these art works around here on campus or back in my home town. I think it would be cool to see interesting peices of art in random places either here or back in my home town. It wouldn't be a distraction at all. It'd be nice to see some bright and fun peices of work here especially on gloomy, depressing days like when its raining and you're walking to class. It'd be something different and add to the atmosphere here even if it would be for a limited time.
ReplyDeleteI feel that public art would be a great idea. I think why not put it on campus or in a public area, it's not hurting anyone and its enjoyable. I love how people are able to express their feelings and emotions and thoughts anyway they would like too. Adding a piece of abstract art on campus would only give it more character and could have a symbolic meaning to it even.
ReplyDeleteI think that it would be really cool to see a piece of art like that around campus. It would give us all something fresh to look at and enjoy while walking around campus. It would be no type of distraction at all and would be raather delightful to see some of the bright and vibrant colors of the pieces. Even if the piece was only here for a limited time it would still be enjoyable for the time that it is up and around. It would be something different for everyone to enjoy and even if you arent into art you will more than likely stop to see the piece and learn about it and take a good look at it.
ReplyDeleteThe large scale art pieces are a definite change to the surroundings. If they are worth it is another question. If construction wouldnt cause a disturbance to my day then i would not be opposed. If it were to disturb traffic, sound of construction, i would be annoyed. The gates above are bright and vibrant and add a nice scenery change. The fact that its only there for a limited amount of time is a benefit if people dont like it.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't mind having that art work at our campus, or in my hometown. I feel that with this art, it would make the scene it is in more interesting and appealing, while also attracting thousands to come see it. I like the idea of having these large scale pieces, that are not permanent, incorporated with the environment.
ReplyDeleteI think it would be a great idea for this art to be created on tbhis campus abdin my hometown. They may get destroyed like all the other flags around here. But it would bring some color during the depressing winter months...also the claude womans work seems depressing how she wrapps the house with cloth.
ReplyDeleteI think that i would not be affected if an artist was to come and set up a temporary art project. Granted it takes a lot of prep work but once it is taken down you can't even tell it was there. Art is art, let it be.
ReplyDeleteI would not be opposed to having a massive piece of instillation art on campus. I think it would be great to have something to change the look of campus a bit, especially during the winter when it is dull at times. Having one in my hometown would be different. I might be more opposed to that because I do not like change. Then again bright colors might make the more rural areas more alive. Considering the fact that the pieces are not permanent I think I can live with having to change my daily activities for the short amount of time that the pieces are present. I think the pieces add spice to the environment and can allow viewers to see the landscape in a different way that may last longer than the piece itself. Erecting a statue beats the purpose of this instillation art. Artists want their pieces to be temporary for a reason, I'm not sure what it is, but having a statue isn't what instillation are means to the artist.
ReplyDeleteI think it would be very interesting if a large scale project was set up on campus. It would make our campus more interesting and intriguing. The fact that it would get taken down would be another plus. Some people may not like it, but they would only have to deal with it for a short period. If this could happen in my hometown, it would be amazing. My hometown is a pretty busy tourist place, and having a project like this go up would only bring in more people. I think, overall, it would be a great idea.
ReplyDeleteI would enjoy having large scale projects on campus and in my hometown; it gives new character to normal surroundings that have become mundane. I think that having large scale projects would make your day to day life a little more interesting and enjoyable!
ReplyDeleteI wouldnt mind having some art like this on campus. I think it would make things more interesting and give students something to look at while walking to class. Also, it was be kind of cool to show things like this off to visitors. I feel like large art work like this is less common so it would be nice to have something different than the normal sized art work. Being so large, this art might get in the way for some students, but since the piece wont be up too long and it's original, i would think it's worth it and people would get used to it. Some artists probably prefer their works existing for a short time because than the piece keeps its meaning and originality.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't mind something like this on campus or even in my hometown. As others have said, adding color and artful installation pieces would break up the humdrum of my daily routine.
ReplyDeleteI would not be opposed to having art like this in my hometown or on campus. If the art work was not temporary I could see it getting in the way on campus, but for only being here for a small amount of time I think it’s worth it. I believe most artists don’t mind that their work only exists for a short time because it gives people the opportunity to appreciate the work.
ReplyDeleteI think it would be really cool to see a large scale project like Christo's work around campus, or in my hometown. It would add something new to the scenery, and make everyone who saw it see their environment in a new and exciting way. Like Christo said, it would "make the world a more beautiful place." Even though his pieces are only up for a short period of time, they add a new twist to the familiar scenery. I think some artists prefer their work to only exist for a limited amount of time to preserve the works meaning and purpose. As well as if the work is only available to be viewed for a limited amount of time, it will create much more interest in a work, as opposed to a statue that will be on display for years.
ReplyDeleteI think this kind of art allows for people to see art in a different venue. Most art is only seen in galleries and museums, being in nature lets it be seen from a different perspective. I'd like to see some of this art on campus. It'd be interesting. I think it'd be a good idea to put some in the oak grove minister's spot he likes to preach in.
ReplyDeleteI like this piece of art because people can not only observe it, they can interact with it as well( walking through it). The arches are unique and i would enjoy going to see them and walk under them myself. This piece is very large and full of color; it is very pleasing to the eye.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't mind at all if this artist were to set up this piece of art in my hometown or on campus. I think it would be a great idea and although it may disrupt our daily activities for a short while it would be a great site to see. Also, it would be interesting and it would draw a lot of people to the art and to the campus or hometown.
ReplyDeleteI think it would be pretty cool to something done by Christo and Jeanne Claude at school or in my hometown. I feel there is no harm in it, as it is only something very temporary. The benefit is it gives you some visual change and something interesting to look at for a little while. A statue would be good as well, however the downside is if people don't like it, it will be there for quite a while and not leave in a few weeks. I think some one artists like their work to be temporary to draw in more speculation. For example, it's like you HAVE to go see it when it's there because it won't be around forever.
ReplyDeletei really like what Christo and Jeanne Claude do..they can make landscape even more beautiful and interesting. i definitely wouldnt mind having something around campus. But i think they like to make their work temporary because yes their art enhances the land for a little, but they take it down so people dont become too distracted by it and forget whats really there.
ReplyDeleteI think it would be cool to see a Christo project happen here at IUP or in my hometown. I wouldnt be concerned about the temporary disruption if any. I feel its worth it to see such art happen because it creates history for that particular area. Although a permanent fixture would be nice, i feel that the artist keeps it temporary so that way the art is appreciated more during the time that its up.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't mind this type of art at all. it adds an interesting view on landscapes. the art transforms everything around it. it's not changing anything that was already there. it's just enhancing it. i don't think that i would have a main concern with any disruptions. i think that the process of watching something come to life so to speak is amazing. the artists probably make their work temporary pieces because after awhile something that isn't new and exciting kind of fades into the background and becomes part of the scenery.
ReplyDeleteI would love to see this type of art around campus or my hometown. I think that it brings out the beauty already in an enviornment and it makes you stop and take notice of maybe things that went un-noticed for a long time.
ReplyDeleteI would like to see something like this on our campus. It makes everything around better. When people visit they always commment on the various pieces of art we already have. Even if it is only for a short while it will enrich our every day lives for the time that we have it.
ReplyDeleteI would not mind seeing like that on campus. I like art that will catch your eye and no one will forget it.
ReplyDeleteI think some artists prefer to have the art available for only a limited amount of time because it adds to the impact that the art makes... When something is around for a long time and it is always there, people start taking it for granted. With art only being available for a short time, people might appreciate it more.
ReplyDeleteI would not have a problem with something temporary being erected in my home town or campus. Honestly I feel like it could enhance our surroundings. So often we take for granted things that we see in our everyday life, if we had something like these works it could draw our eye and make us appreciate things we so often looked past or disregarded. Also, if it has negative effects on the community, or people are offended by it. It can be removed, its not something permanent that is going to scar the landscape for years to come. It is a temporary work of art for us to appreciate while it lasts. Almost like the changing seasons. I think that these works of art are beautiful and do nothing but enhance the natural atmosphere.
ReplyDeleteI would not have any problem if one of these large scale pieces was erected. I think their facinating. Its great that their temporary because not only will it make the onlooker appreciate the piece that much more but it will not harm the enviorment.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't mind having some new artwork on campus. It would give the students something to look forward to in the time it is being constructed, and when it's gone, something unique to remember.
ReplyDeleteI don't think having this on campus would be a bad idea. It's always nice to have more and new artwork to admire. Anything that is creative or a good idea i think wouldn't be bad to have. Especially since all the art work we have now I am kind of used to. It would be original and more large scale, which I think would be better than a regular painting.
ReplyDeleteI would not be offended or upset if something like this was put on campus. It would give it more life and color I would in fact quite enjoy it. A more permanent statue would also be fine with me as long as it is tasteful.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't mind more art like this around campus as long as it doesn't disrupt the flow around campus
ReplyDeleteI would definitely love to have art like this on campus. I also think the fact that this kind of art gets taken down is good, because after a while you get bored with seeing the same thing everyday.
ReplyDeleteI would really enjoy something like this being built in my hometown. I live in a very closed minded area. A small town of hicks pretty much, don't get me wrong, it has small town charm, but I really think my town could use some culture, out side of there own.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't mind at all. It would actually bring some life to where ever it would be around me. Whatever it would be would bring some culture to my hometown.
ReplyDeleteI love what Christo and Jeanne Claude do so much. The fact that they say there is no other meaning in their pieces other than to make people see a place differently is amazing. I would love if they did something in this area to add some color and make people appreciate it more.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I really enjoy both of the unique art pieces designed by Christo and Jeanne Claude. Their desplays leave a sense wonder and imagination in the eyes of the beholder and invites you to think outside of the box that we call "ordinary" life. If a large design like, Surrounded Islands or The Umbrellas, were to be displayed at IUP, I think it would be a great idea,attract many future college students, and overall would be a great addition to campus. It would be nice to have a seasonal changing display rather then a permanent outside display, because it would challenge students to open their eyes and minds to new things. Artists would most likely agree to that fact. In Conclusion, the materials used and the areas in which these pieces are displayed are phynominal and I most deffinately give them a two thumbs up!
ReplyDeleteNo, I wouldn’t be opposed to it anywhere. I would find it fascinating and bringing an interesting aspect of culture to the places if it would be made to actually happen there. I think it would also boost the relationship of the place in the community by giving the local residents something to talk and reminisce about in the town. I’m sure a statue would be just as good, but something temporary would be more of an impact in my opinion. It is also a positive in the view of the Artist because they may find the art stunning now, but maybe in the future they might end up regretting they made it or forget why they made it.
ReplyDeleteThough these pieces are very interesting, I do not feel like they would be appropriate on campus. They are very large and take up a lot of space. Also it's not worth all the time and money that it takes to set something like that up for a short amount of time
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't oppose the idea of a art piece like the bridge covering or umbrella project. But given the choice, I would rather erect a statue. Not only will the statue weather the test of time, but it will most likely honor something to give future generations an insight into our era.
ReplyDeleteI think large scale artwork being constructed in towns, campuses, and other places is an interesting idea. It's something that everyone will be able to see when they are out and about and its something that they won't be expecting to see, and its different, and also sparks their interest. I don't think that these pieces would disturb peoples daily lives, they are just simply their to entertain them. Even though it isn't there for a long time, I think that it's there long enough to make an impact on the people that see it because they have never seen something like that before. I think that some of the artists choose to only have their pieces constructed for a limited amount of time because it's just their style of art that they do, and it may bring a larger amount of people to see the piece because of it being there for a small amount of time.
ReplyDeleteI think it would be great to do something like this on campus!
ReplyDeleteI personally really like when there is art in random places that catches the eye. It brings a change to any normal day and is definitely worth having if one can. I wouldn't put something outrageously big on campus because there is already enough kids walking around all day that take up enough space. But I would definitely consider having something not to small, but not to big that pops out and is very unique.
ReplyDeleteI love seeing art in random places especially on a college campus. Even though I don't consider myself a big art person I still enjoy looking at art when I'm walking through campus. I also agree with Mike Gibbons for the fact that I would not put tremendously big art pieces all around campus because yes Mike, there are a lot of kids.
ReplyDeleteI would love to see art like that on campus or even in my hometown. Especially now during winter it would make the campus more colorful and just bring more life to a place.
ReplyDeletei personally believe that alot of these questions differ in different contexts. Some people like to look at a space and enjoy it for its natural beauty, not "beauty" someone has artistically inserted. But, there are times that I think works like Christo and Jean Claude's are appropriate and acceptable. Instances like Central Park is fine to me because it's inserting something interesting and beautiful into a space that was previously void of those two things because the season. I think Christo understands this fact and that's why many, if not all, of his pieces are temporary. This allows the natural beauty to take center stage following his insertion.
ReplyDeleteI would love to see work of art like this on campus and through out my hometown. I think having something different and unusual happen somewhere that is otherwise very plan, gives something to discuss. When you see so mething in this nature of art work around everyso often, It gives people a different kind of change and most people enjoy that. Seeing the same kind of scenery all the time becomes very boring. Art work is never boring to most people. I also think that is why the artist only keep work like this up for a certain amount of time. It also makes the viewer wonder what to expect next
ReplyDeletehaving art like this on campus would be really neat, and also add a lot to the scenery.
ReplyDeletethis is pretty neat. i think having this on campus would be pretty awesome. it would be very creative
ReplyDeleteThis is idea of art is very interesting. i like the fact that it changes our everyday views of our enviornment
ReplyDeletealso i believe that the artist chose a very unique color to put in central park
ReplyDeleteI think that a big work of art would be perfect for our campus even if it was only around for a little bit of time. Some artists perfer their works only stay around for a limited amount of time. I feel this is because they want to draw more attention and give people a reason to go see it. If the desired audience knows that the work will only be around for a limited amount of time, they will be sure to get out and see it knowing that they do not have infinite time to do so.
ReplyDeleteI would love to see art like this scattered around campus, it would make the campus come more alive
ReplyDeleteI wouldnt mind seeing art like this around campus. I think it would be fun and different, in a good way!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoy this type of art, and would have loved to see it in person, I only wish they would have been left up longer.
ReplyDeleteI would not be opposed to a Christo project on campus at all! But as for my hometown, I think my feelings, would be a little bit different. As for the disruption of my daily activities, I don’t think it would have much of an impact on myself or much of anyone one campus. I mean campus is already hectic enough, what’s a little more going to do? Personally I do believe a project like the umbrellas would be worth the consideration though they are only up for a very limited amount of time. In my opinion I think a piece of work would probably enhance the environment and community of Indiana positively. I don’t think it would be better to just erect a permanent statue rather than having a temporary piece of work; this is because I believe people would be more forced to come at a certain time rather whenever they have the time, which would then draw more attention to the piece. And this is probably also why some artists prefer that their works are only for a limited amount of time rather than an extended time frame.
ReplyDeleteI think having one of these projects in my hometown or on campus would be great. They are not only great to look at but they will also bring publicity to the small towns. I don't think that the disruption would be that big of a deal. I think that the work enhances the environment in a very positive way. I think that because the work is only up for a short amount of time makes the work even better.
ReplyDeleteI think having one of their pieces of work in my hometown or on campus would be great. I do not think that they would cause any disruption in either setting. I think that they would bring more publicity to both settings. I think a temporary piece is better than a permanent one because you will remember it more because it is temporary. I think some artists like to only keep their artwork up temporarily because it sticks out in peoples minds and it is different, which therefore makes temporary art better and more interesting.
ReplyDeletei would to see this type of work on campus, because the campus looks all plain. installation work would spice things up a bit. everyone would want to come out and see the work.
ReplyDeleteI love Christo's work because it is so random to me. Having something like that done on our campus is just what we need because it is so boring and simple. To one day go outside and see a Big huge spectacle all around campus would be incredible and would make us appreciate the campus more because we would always wonder when is it coming back or was it a one time thing and why? It gets your mind racing with ideas of what was it for and how did they think of doing something so extreme but at the same time so beautiful.
ReplyDeleteall art is worth making as long as it speaks to one single person.
ReplyDeleteThe idea of art in random places is an awesome idea to me because of the fact that each individual person has the chance to give it their own personal meaning. This piece of example, can change meaning giving the time of day or forcast. Each person coming on a given day can form their own meaning to it.
ReplyDeleteI would not have a problem at all with having an installation on campus or in my hometown. There is no reason to get upset by it if it is only going to be there for a limited amount of time and I'm sure it wouldn't disrupt people's day-to-day activities and it would be nice to see something different outside after seeing the same things every day.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't mind if a piece of art work like this was placed on campus or in my hometown. It would obviously be placed somewhere where it couldn't disrupt anybody or their activities and wouldn't be permanent. This type of art is very interesting to me. Giant objects in random places like that is interesting. I'd actually like to see one of these pieces of art in person one day.
ReplyDeleteI would absolutely love to have this type of thing happen in my hometown. I believe it would be something good to happen to my hometown for once. I believe the attention would be positive, though it would disrupt the daily activities of the city since they would be more people and people looking at the art. I believe even thoguh it'd only be up for a little bit it would be worth it. It's always cool to have a memory of something to that scale. I feel as if it would help people to slow down and take a look around, rather than just scurrying through.
ReplyDeleteI would not be opposed to having a Cristo piece on my campus or my hometown but I understand why there would be controversy over them because the set up would be disruptive to everyday life. However, they are doing in on public property so they would have the right and I think that it does give the environment character and it does enhance it. I would not be concerned about the disruption because I think that seeing the final piece would be worth it. I do not think that it would be better to just erect a statue because it takes away from this type of art. It is temporary for a reason.
ReplyDeleteI would actually enjoy seeing a large scale Christo work on our campus or in my hometown. Christo's artwork is very interesting to me and i wouldnt mind seeing it on a daily basis. Of course there are people out there who would oppose of having this work displayed but that kind of criticism comes with any and everything. So overall I feel that it would get a very positive response if displayed.
ReplyDelete